I saw an ad for this car on Hemmings Classifed on line today. This car looked to be in beautiful condition before the collision. The interior looked really nice. There are more pictures in the ad.

Best regards.

Jeff Kinzler

Views: 109

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

One hell of an impact !!
Good to see the drivers compartment was not affected by such a great impact keeping the drive safe to some degree

Jeff
Was this the standard Crash Test we often see to test for driver safety ?
Any idea what the speed was that did this much damage ?

I must say looking at this damage is very sad and disturbing to me

Enjoy

Tony you and I have been around long enough to remember “ in a Cadillac you walk away from the crash”
The fact that the impact happens 8’ away from your head and close to half the weight of the car is on that area must provide an engineering safety factor that protects occupants.

The very strong large steel frame under our cars and the massive bumpers do act to prevent the passengers from physical damage depending on the type of impact and direction a crash happens in those days
In there day the Large Cadillacs were considered a safe car to be in out on the road

We have come a long way over the years in passenger saftey and a completely different approach to the subject of passenger safety with the unibody designed car

Very interesting that Cadillac was the first to introduce seat belts in cars that became law a year after being introduced by them

Enjoy

That's a pretty big hit.

In a 1964 Cadillac, you have 2 crumble zones. (Whatever its hit and the occupants)

I reckon, with either no belts or the factory lap belts, immediately after the car impacts the other "object", the next thing to happen is the removal of your front teeth from the impact with the steering wheel.  Then, as your melon he flies back the other way, it can impact with the rear passengers head, as its still traveling forward with a greater distance prior to meeting something solid.

Meanwhile, with little or no "give" due to the massive solid structure (your 64 Cadillac), all your internal organs begin to play hid and seek, as they shoot around your insides like two bubbles in a piss pot.

Your flailing arms, will begin to bitch slap anyone within a 500 yard radius.

Your eyeballs will shoot out until they hit the windscreen like a moth drawn to a light, before being repelled back into your head at Mach 1 warp speed, with the return impact knocking out your ear wax.

Due to the last nano second oh shit moment you experience prior to a major crash, the butt pucker factor, will see most of the drivers seat material zip up ya bum like a rat up a drain pipe.

Then, as you sit there, bleeding, broken and slightly unhappy, the moron in the other car runs over and says..... Sorry mate, I didn't see you.

The previously, uninjured second party, will now speed 3 weeks in a coma after being near beaten to death with a tyre iron by..... shall we say... a slightly miffed 64 Cadillac owner.  

I sure hope it never happens to me or the Fleetwood.... I'd be devastated.

Really painful to look at, but I think it's really amazing how modern technology has created  paint that flexes with the steel without flaking & chipping. Depending on the frame , she looks repairable to me : replace front clip.

Kevin

Gotta love your very vivid detailed explination
Just thank god most accidents do not involve this high an impact --Amen

Where i am living in north west central Florida the size of the vehicles on the road is rather amazing
Every where you look you will see a very large pick up truck some often jacked way up
and cutting in and out to get to the next light side by side --LOL !
Being in a smaller car - my Scion -makes this more obvious

Just so you know: -- when our Cadillacs were NEW they were one of the very largest cars on the road In there time
So that was a big part of them being able to take a hit from some other smaller cars with no problem
A large vehicle gives you some special unexplainable rights and authority on the road if you get my drift
That was the case with our Cadillacs back in the day ( i just love using that term !) and that added to what these cars were about then ( when new )
They were large enough to --RULE THE ROAD-- in there day
We have lost that quality with the very large vehicles on the roads today and they now rule the roads
Of coarse they don't look 1/16 as good as we do out there on the road ---YES !!!!!!

1963 - 64 CLASSIC ANTIQUE CADILLACS FOREVER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wish you were all there when these cars were new - they were exceptionally good times in America and our cars are very much an expression of those high quality Standards of those times

Enjoy

Enjoy

Enjoy

I cannot look at that damage without getting upset
One hell of a bad accident

Add to my above post these cars were --one of the Heavier passenger cars on the road in there day adding to the Crash protection these cars were know for then
I know my 64 convertible is 4,200 lbs and my 63 chevy was 3,200 lbs as an example
A no Brainner which one would hold up better in a a high impact situation

Enjoy

The big difference now, is the crumble zone tech they use in modern cars.

The 59 Chevy VS 2009 Chevy on YouTube is a great example. Your old China plate in the 59 would end up brown bread while the 2009 driver would dust off the powder from the airbag and live to fight another day.

Keep in mind though, in the clip, both cars hit dead square which would be highly unlikely in real life. In real life, unless both are asleep or brain dead, one or both would swerve and even as little as a 10 of 15% angle would start to give a lesser impact.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtxd27jlZ_g

Like any test, you can set things up to show the worse case scenario to embellish the point you are trying to push. Whilst the maximum impact is possible, i would expect, its not all that probable.

In one yearbook we wrote:

“Statistics don’t lie, but statisticians do.”

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Forum

Is this possible or total BS?

Started by Kim K Kaiser in 1963/64 Cadillac Specific Discussion. Last reply by Kim K Kaiser 19 seconds ago. 2 Replies

After changing tie rods, i tokk car into wheel n allignment shop. He said no problem.  He calls back about 45 minutes later and said they couldnt get between the tire and cowl, the guys head was too…Continue

Vacuum / Parking Brake / NSS Question

Started by Karl Schwarz in 1963/64 Cadillac Specific Discussion. Last reply by Karl Schwarz 57 minutes ago. 2 Replies

I bought a 1963 Series 62 Convertible in July.It makes a hissing sound when in neutral, and sometimes when in drive (when the shift is more to the left that the right. I assume this related to a NSS…Continue

Tail pipe black stuff!

Started by Lambert Ross in 1963/64 Cadillac Specific Discussion. Last reply by Lambert Ross 23 hours ago. 10 Replies

any ideas how to clear the ugly black stuff shooting out from my tailpipe? After a long layover, it really messes up the garage floor. I assume its carbon but am not sure how best to react to it.…Continue

Had the 64 convert out for a spin

Started by Tony and Ginny 429 in 1963/64 Cadillac Specific Discussion yesterday. 0 Replies

A two hour ride to my favorite restaurant on the water in Crystal River on the west coast  of central Florida —top down 77 degrees and 47 % humidity one outstanding day as will be the rest of the…Continue

Tags: Fl, River, Crystal

Blog Posts

still need a driveshaft

Posted by wayne weaver on November 26, 2019 at 11:53am 0 Comments

well thank you UPS for losing the driveshaft that Russ Austin shipped me. 

however i still need a rear driveshaft section for my 63. mine has a vibration due to the bushing inside of it. its a shame because the ball and sockets in the cardian joints are perfect but it has a woble on the balancing machine. so .  still need the rear section. anyone have a good one ? is there driveshaft alternatives to use ? i am really considering an LS swap and since im fighting the driveshaft search…

Continue

63 guidematic issues

Posted by maurice lapoiinte on November 24, 2019 at 3:10pm 0 Comments

 So my 63 guide matic headlamps stay on low beam all the time. I have so far bypassed the system and everything works normal. I have been thru the trouble shooting in the manual but this is where the confusion begins.on my car when the power relay is powered I have low beam and when its not powered I have highbeam, this appears to be opposite what the diagnosis says should be correct.The wiring is all original and no wires have been mixed up.has anyone ever unplugged the 2 wire connector…

Continue

Another advantage of the Pertronix III

Posted by Doug Scarrow on November 23, 2019 at 11:12am 1 Comment

   Having tried both the II and III I can say the multispark feature of the III offers a smoother idle . It is also easier to install .Does not require removal of the distributor

Stuck at two red (dash) lights!

Posted by Jeff Kinzler on November 3, 2019 at 10:00pm 9 Comments

I hope someone can help solve these two electrical problems that appeared one after the other.

By way of background: The car, a '64 Eldorado has very limited use. It was at a restoration shop for 15 months until last January-  that supposedly did a bunch of wiring repairs including rebuilding the gas gauge that still hasn't worked properly, and the clock that hasn't worked, and re-soldering the broken wires in the drive door. All window and seat controls appear to be…

Continue

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2019   Created by Jason Edge.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service