After a few days of driving wo any problems.. i thought about maybe greasing the frame or the front suspension .   There is a grease fitting on the bottom side of each wheel, and a little bolt on the top,  should that little bolt be removed and a fitting put in there to grease the ball joint in there or should it be just left alone and use only the fitting on the bottom side?

i also found the fittings on the two rear ones on the drive shaft, and front shaft area...so i may give those a squirt as well,, i read somewhere recently they should be done around each standard oil change, so that means i have missed two times, maybe that is why i am getting a bounce sort of squeak when i roll in to a speed bump or just a hump in horribly maintained roads.

Sincerely

Views: 168

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The upper/lower ball joints, 4 tie rod ends, idler arm, and pitman arm should have zerk fittings.   I usually do it every other oil change.

Hand held grease gun or pneumatic is up to you.  The pneumatic gun has a air driven piston that pushes the grease out the hose.

So far,  ok.  Dnt want to jinx it though.  Will get to the grease fittings,   try to squelch the front end squeeks.i apparentky hv found the lower ball joints,  shoukd i undo that little screw and replace w zerk. ?  Or shoukd ir be left alone and fill onky the lower side?  

Not all ball joints, tie rod rod ends and so on have grease nipples. It depends on the manufacturer. If the nipple is missing it could mean that it has been intentionally removed, never installed or broken off. It might also be the case where there never was a grease nipple on the replacement part. On a 50+ old car the suspension parts can have been replaced several times.

In the manual its stated that upper and lower control arm spherical joints will NOT require further lubrication.

With all the problem you have stated over the last year, my guess is that your car has been through a lot. So don't expect the parts to be original, might very well have been replaced by cheaper and/or inferior parts 10-30 years ago. Parts designed without grease nipples.

If you worry about suspension, then greasing might not be the main problem. Check the upper control arm bushings. They worn fast, most likely faster then the other bushings. Easy to spot if you open the hood. So just check them (both sides). If damaged you need to replace them. I did my car one year ago. Replaced it all with Kanter parts. Was well worth it (except the short threading on the Kanter rear shocks).

A picture a damaged rubber bushing on the steel links for the stabilizer bar:

Worn rubber bushing on stabilizer bar:

Very worn upper control arm bushing:

Replacing the upper control arm bushing by pressing on the shaft:

My advise to you Kim is to check all of the front and rear bushings, joints, yokes and so on. If not replaced by you and if you have no knowledge when they were replaced then that should tell you that they would most likely need to be replaced. Its not very difficult. Order the full kit from Kanter or some other source. Lift the car. Remove one side at the time. Buy a smart bushing removal/fitting tool kit or pass by your local repair shop and have them remove and install the bushings and joints in the control arms for you.

Then take the car to the shop for a good alignment.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Forum

Trivia #34 - What % of 1963 & 1964 Cadillacs Came with Tinted Glass

Started by Jason Edge in Trivia. Last reply by Dennis P. DiBari 16 minutes ago. 5 Replies

What % of 1963 and 1964 Cadillacs came with the optional "soft ray" tented glass?  1963 & 1964 were very close, so if you get one you will get the other. Need to get it within 3%. So, who will…Continue

Trivia #33 - What % of 1963 Cadillacs Came with Limited Slip (Posi) Differential Rear End

Started by Jason Edge in Trivia. Last reply by Jason Edge yesterday. 3 Replies

It has been way too long since we posted any trivia (and gave out a cigar), so here is one I thought I might have posted but do not see it: What % of 1963 Cadillacs came with the optional "Controlled…Continue

1963 Coupe de Ville Located in NC For Sale

Started by Jason Edge in For Sale. Last reply by Jason Edge on Friday. 2 Replies

I had an older couple contact me indicating they are selling their 1963 Coupe de Ville they have had for 40 years and they are located Moyock, NC, which is in the very north east part of North…Continue

Front grill

Started by Phillip Hill in 1963/64 Cadillac Specific Discussion. Last reply by Dennis P. DiBari on Thursday. 15 Replies

Hi everyone im currently restoring my my front grill due to some previous clown painting it with silver frost paint and doing a dodgy job I would like to know what parts of the grill are anodised.it…Continue

Blog Posts

1963 RHS A/C kick panel - photos needed

Posted by SK on June 2, 2025 at 2:20pm 2 Comments

Could someone post front and back photos of the 1963 right-hand kick panel with A/C?

My car didn’t come with the original kick panels, so it's a bit of a mystery to me how I should cut the backing board and carpet to fit around the A/C.

Many thanks,

-Samu

Edelbrock Carb Block off Plates

Posted by Chase on March 12, 2025 at 2:05pm 14 Comments

Hey guys,

I have installed the same Edelbrock carb and have done everything the same as Jason’s carb and intake project. In the spring and summer months the car starts, runs and idles great! In the fall and winter months on a cold start, the car starts awful and wants to die until it warms up. I have to keep my foot on the throttle until it warms up or it will idle just terrible and try to die. Once it’s warm, it runs fantastic! Whats going on here? I was thinking of removing the…

Continue

'63 Tailfin Tales

Posted by Mark Mata on February 22, 2025 at 5:00pm 9 Comments

New old stock seat material

Posted by Ray Schick on August 22, 2024 at 6:25pm 2 Comments

I bought this seat material thinking that it’s…

Continue

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All