Comment
The block is the one i got from you. I will work on the displays and questions.
My phone is always on and tyned in to the manual i have in my phone. Having not done or been around the balancer, i hv to go to youtube for visual context. Whike its not engine specific, it gives me reference. One i reference is a guy rebuilding an old 350 SB. Lots of similar things but i always go back to book to try to correlate what i see, and whats printed. If its still not clear, i watch it or another video again for better reference. I was using the help tab to try and back up what i had done as i rembered that reference article. I hv been in and out of manual on each segment. And once i read it, then watch a video, then go back and read, it makes much more sense. Then i go to help tab if i still hv a doubt. Then here. Other than the dropped piston, been going fairly smoothly. All the measureing torgueing and measuring and un torqueing gets a bit monotonous, but overall, ok. We shall see
I would use the shop manual! LOL. Torque to 125 ft lb as indicated and you should be good to go. Read and reread the shop manual and follow step by step. when I rebuilt my engine and re-assembled it I followed the shop manual exactly step by step and do not remember anything that was not covered. I have the benefit of having disassembled dozens, and have put some back together, but never a complete lower end rebuild, but the shop manual was spot on as far as I remembered. If you get into second guessing the shop manual you will probably end up making problems for yourself.
There is also nothing wrong with posting the questions here, but how about a bit of background. Looking at that picture I still do not have a clue if this is the current running engine or the rebuild engine. You didn't provide the background details before you asked your questions and still did not answer it after I asked what I was looking at? If you had said up front, this is my rebuild engine, and I have pushed it on to 125 ft lbs of torque per shop manual but still not sure about this gap and then posted your question, that would have made more sense and been more clear to anyone trying to help you.
I was using an article on this site regarding the location. That mentioned the .25 inch measurement, and the timing mark, as you pointed out. Those were my references. I have not done the 125 lb torque as i was asking about the location as it sits, based on that article before i did the final totque on it. So regardless of msmnt. The standard would be go till it stops, then 125?
Is this the running engine you already have or the engine you are rebuilding? If this is off the running engine I am not sure what the purpose of the question is as I assume the balancer was properly pushed on and the belts were in alignement. It may be a nice to know spec but has no bearing on installation as I will address that next.
If this is the balancer going back on the newly rebuilt engine, I guess this is a way to ask if it has went in far enough? The answer is, if you torque the balancer on using an installation bolt to 125 ft lb, it will be pushed all the way on. In other words the balancer will stop moving when it is completely installed. I looked at mine and your gap from looks about the same as mine. Again, my question would be did you torque it down to 125 ft lb and until it stopped moving? Getting that gap measurement ot me is about as meaningless as measuring the width of the valve covers when installing them.
A better tale-tale sign for me is the fact the front edge of the timing indicator is about even with the back edge of the balancer.. but really don't put much stock on that... the goal is to get it pushed on until it stops moving and that should be before you hit the 125 ft lb shop manual spec. See mine below as an example.
Started by Kurt in 1963/64 Cadillac Specific Discussion. Last reply by Russ Austin 9 hours ago. 11 Replies 4 Likes
Many owners have reported oil leaks at the rear main seal even after replacing the seal, myself included. Recently Tony Lentini found a Serviceman bulletin published in February 1965 which details a…Continue
Started by Doug Scarrow in For Sale yesterday. 0 Replies 0 Likes
correct set of 4 rear traing arm shims for 1959 thru 1964 Cadillacs used to correct and adjust pinion angle. part number 1471231. just listed on Ebay…Continue
Started by Jason Edge in General Discussion. Last reply by Jason Edge yesterday. 33 Replies 0 Likes
I had brought up the topic of radiator leaks as a discussion topic for our Chapter Zoom meet-up this past Sunday and thought I would share on our website for everyone and probably do a more formal…Continue
Posted by Ray Schick on August 22, 2024 at 6:25pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
I bought this seat material thinking that it’s…
ContinuePosted by Dave Fehrle on March 23, 2024 at 3:23pm 8 Comments 1 Like
While checking my Carter carb with engine running, I took the air cleaner off and there was a very loud hissing sound of air. I placed a piece of paper over the carb and it didn’t move up or down, is this normal?
Posted by Chase on March 21, 2024 at 5:55am 0 Comments 1 Like
Hey everyone, has anybody done a Vintage Air AC/Heat setup in their car? I want to bypass the old vacuum setup and go with a Vintage Air Gen 2 model. Before I get started, does anyone have any experience with this? (Which model to go with, do’s and dont’s, etc.) It looks pretty involved. Any and all info/pics would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Posted by CHRIS CARLSON on December 6, 2023 at 10:54am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Who rebuilds original AC accumulator dryers for 1964 Cadillac? I have been on Classic auto air in Tampa FL wait list for over a year , There is one on Old air products web site that looks very similar to the original # 21-4214A but states it fits 1962 Gm cars, The one recommended for a 1964 Cadillac is half the length 21-4215A What is everyone using ? I would prefer to be as original as possible. Thanks
December 15, 2024 from 7pm to 8:30pm – Zoom
0 Comments 0 Likes© 2024 Created by Jason Edge. Powered by
You need to be a member of 63/64 Cadillac Website to add comments!
Join 63/64 Cadillac Website